To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is a list of diseases commonly found here and in populations that eat and live like the U.
Continued debate over of the adverse health impacts of sugary drinks is coupled with heating debate over the propriety of a tax on a dietary pleasure — a pleasure some believe people have an unassailable right to partake in, but others find to be a health hazard. Here are some recent arguments from vocal advocates on both sides of the debate: Opponents Americans Against Food Taxes has started a campaign urging citizens to petition politicians to oppose taxes on junk food.
The coalition has twin primary aims: According to a recent Reuters article: Think New Mexicoa think tank in the state, is advocating a junk food tax in lieu of a food tax, suggesting: However, with New Mexico facing a potential re-taxation of all foods, the concept of a junk food tax would represent a limitation on proposed taxation.
It is difficult to imagine producingbehavior change of this magnitude through education alone, evenif government devoted massive resources to the task. In contrast,a sales tax on sugared drinks would generate considerable revenue,and as with the tax on tobacco, it could become a key tool inefforts to improve health.
Some of the arguments reflect conflicting beliefs on fundamental facts.
For example, there is some dispute about the impact that sodas have on obesity and the impact that a tax would have on soda consumption. There is evidence that taxes on cigarettes reduced cigarette consumption. Taxes will be more effective at discouraging consumption of junk food that education alone.
Reduce the costs of treating medical issues to which junk food contributes. Generate additional revenue, part of which could be used to offset costs of treating medical issues that arise from over consumption of junk foods.
Could shift consumer spending to healthier foods, bolstering the industries that produce those foods. Arguments Against Junk Food Taxes The tax is unfair A junk food tax is regressive The tax is a sales tax and all sales taxes are regressive.
Lower income people either spend more money in total, or more money as a percentage of their total income, on junk food.
The tax unfairly targets junk food. Among all potential unhealthy habits that people may enjoy, junk food would be unfairly singled out. Consumers have not expressed enough price sensitivity to junk food to conclude that a junk food tax would adequately dissuade consumption.
Would distract from more important health agendas like educating people to make their own healthy dietary decisions. Would restrict the freedom of people to make their own dietary choices.
Would hurt industries that create and sell the taxed foods, potentially costing jobs in those industries.
Feel free to post additional arguments in the comments section. The Balance The opponents and proponents of the junk food tax seem to draw vastly different conclusions about the effect of sugary drinks on national health.
The level of contribution of sugary drinks to a variety of health problems impacting our nation may be subject to debate.
Many disincentives from parking fines to cigarette taxes disproportionately impact lower income citizens without condemnation. Is a junk food tax categorically different? Citizens may simply feel that the freedom to make individual dietary selections is beyond the realm of appropriate government regulation?
One can debate the detrimental impact of certain junk foods and the potential or lack of potential positive impact that taxing them might have. But if society believes that people have a right to cause and endure any detriment that might be caused by junk food, free of the influence of taxation, then the aforementioned debate may be moot.
On the other hand, why should junk food be exempt from sales tax while other pleasures rely on goods that are taxed? Many states that have sales taxes have exempted groceries from sales taxes. To what extent does this policy hold true for sodas and other junk foods?
It might be true that spending on sodas represents a larger portion of income for the poor. But are sodas and other junk food necessities? What is the policy behind exempting sodas and other junk foods from sales tax while levying a tax on other pleasures such as cigarettes, DVDs and books?Opposing Viewpoints in Context, it was because I knew I wouldn’t be able to stick to it or maybe it was because I didn’t want to give up all of the junk food that I ate, but I never really.
» Submit Your Site To The "Opposing Views" Directory. CO2 Science Magazine. Corporate Junk Science In The Media (Part 1) By Edward S. Herman Corporate junk science plays an extremely important role in the public relations and regulatory strategies of the chemical industry.
Is the Kyoto Protocol a Threat to the Global Food Supply Bad. Read. Engage. Grow. One Book One LCC is a shared community reading experience that encourages students, faculty, and staff to engage in special events, discussions, and college-wide conversations surrounding a thought-provoking common read.
Apr 04, · Most linguists today agree that having a word for something alters our perception of it in some way. This is a version of the “Sapir-Whorf hypothesis,” named for Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee.
Erik Townsend is a retired software entrepreneur turned hedge fund manager. Throughout his career, Erik has capitalized on his ability to understand complex systems and anticipate paradigm shifts far in advance of the mainstream.
Should Schools Ban Junk Food and Sodas? 1. Should Schools Ban Junk Food and Sodas?By Mrs. Wilson 2. In the past 2 years, over a dozen states have considered legislation limiting the availability of junk food in schools.
Some people feel that banning junk food is totally unnecessary and is an over reaction to a small problem.