The Court decided that such evidence is also inadmissible in State courts in Mapp v.
July 16, by brookeblevins 1 Comment Group 5 Reflections for 8. Today we talked about making good arguments. An argument is a statement that has support from evidence. It is important that citizens understand effective argumentation so they can protect their rights.
My favorite thing about today was doing the mock trial for the court case New Jersey vs. As a response to some reflection questions: Name three things you learned today.
How a case would be argued in court B.
How to be a good lawyer C. I learned the difference between evidence and claim 2. What makes a good argument? You have to have good evidence and good reasoning. You have to know what you are talking about in order to defend your client.
Why is it important that citizens understand effective argumentation? It is important because that way you know what your case is about and you can use your knowledge against the other team to win.
My favorite part about today was going to court and acting as part of a real play. Group Reflections for 8. I know that I can make a difference with this problem and that we have a responsibility to help homeless people. My favorite part of today was looking for pictures of homeless people and shelters in the Waco area.
I filled out the reflection sheet p. Three things I learned today are…Veterans are sometimes homeless, JFK was in the Bay of Pigs War, homeless people use shopping carts to hold their stuff. Do you think you can make a difference in your community?
I learned a lot today at camp. I learned how to play iCivics and about the problem with the homeless and how I can help. I found out that 3 million people in the U. After we chose an issue today, I wanted to find out some statistics about homelessness in Waco.
The lowest poverty rating in parts of the city of Waco are 3. The highest poverty rate in part of Waco is I can help homeless people in Waco by volunteering at Mission Waco serving food and stacking food.
My favorite part of today was definitely playing Activate on iCivics. It helped me learn about what I can do to make a difference in my city.
Since our groups decided to talk about homelessness, I figured out through playing the game and doing research that giving money and support, and raising awareness are the best ways to help my community.Dec 19, · Connecting the talk to the audience. “In New Jersey v. TLO, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider the appropriateness of the application of the exclusionary rule.
What does that mean? I heard that during a student presentation about landmark Supreme Court cases. Whether or not stress and/or anxiety develop in a stressful situation appears to be related to one's perceived sense of _____.
New Jersey v. T.L.O., This case debated whether students at school should have the same rights that suspects are guaranteed under the 4th Amendment. Historical Background. The Supreme Court has a long history of upholding citizens' protections against unreasonable searches and seizures—a right guaranteed by the 4th Amendment.
This New Jersey v.
T.L.O. () Lesson Plan is suitable for 9th - 12th Grade. Students examine student search and seizure. In this Supreme Court lesson plan, students examine primary documents from New Jersey v. Young scholars study the court case of New Jersey vs. T.L.O. and discuss citizen rights pertaining to the laws of search and.
tlo The presentation above outlines the major facts of the Supreme Court case, New Jersey v.
TLO. The slideshow explains the issues, findings, and impact of the case as it relates to education. Reasonable suspicion is a standard borne of that balancing act. It comes from a US Supreme Court case, New Jersey v.
TLO, stemming from the search of a New Jersey student suspected of smoking in the bathroom. Smoking in the Bathroom. Administrators found more than just cigarettes on TLO.